<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Triple trip report from ACCU, C++ Russia and C++Now 2018 – Part 2	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.fluentcpp.com/2018/06/12/triple-trip-report-from-accu-c-russia-and-cnow-2018-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.fluentcpp.com/2018/06/12/triple-trip-report-from-accu-c-russia-and-cnow-2018-part-2/</link>
	<description>Jonathan Boccara&#039;s blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2018 10:58:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: jft		</title>
		<link>https://www.fluentcpp.com/2018/06/12/triple-trip-report-from-accu-c-russia-and-cnow-2018-part-2/#comment-1057</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jft]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2018 10:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.fluentcpp.com/?p=3774#comment-1057</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#039;Modern&#039; C++ design was, of course, a classic must-read c++ text - when first published in 2001. I still have my well-thumbed copy on my bookshelf. But &#039;Modern&#039; after 17 years and three revisions to the c++ standard? Please, authors, I know you want to make your book &#039;stand out&#039; and so achieve sales but consider the longevity when choosing a title. There is also Scott Meyers excellent &quot;Effective &#039;Modern&#039; c++&quot; book - but when c++30 is released I doubt the c++ we know today will still be classed as &#039;modern&#039; - just as c++ from 2001 is no longer &#039;modern&#039;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Modern&#8217; C++ design was, of course, a classic must-read c++ text &#8211; when first published in 2001. I still have my well-thumbed copy on my bookshelf. But &#8216;Modern&#8217; after 17 years and three revisions to the c++ standard? Please, authors, I know you want to make your book &#8216;stand out&#8217; and so achieve sales but consider the longevity when choosing a title. There is also Scott Meyers excellent &#8220;Effective &#8216;Modern&#8217; c++&#8221; book &#8211; but when c++30 is released I doubt the c++ we know today will still be classed as &#8216;modern&#8217; &#8211; just as c++ from 2001 is no longer &#8216;modern&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
