Comments on: Move iterators: where the STL meets Move semantics https://www.fluentcpp.com/2017/04/25/move-iterators/ Jonathan Boccara's blog Fri, 25 May 2018 10:10:34 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.4 By: Vladislav Kaplan https://www.fluentcpp.com/2017/04/25/move-iterators/#comment-229 Thu, 27 Apr 2017 05:55:00 +0000 https://www.fluentcpp.com/?p=1069#comment-229 Thank you

]]> By: Jonathan https://www.fluentcpp.com/2017/04/25/move-iterators/#comment-227 Tue, 25 Apr 2017 19:46:00 +0000 https://www.fluentcpp.com/?p=1069#comment-227 In reply to Sandeep.

This is correct, it will usually be the empty string, unless it fits into the buffer for the small string optimization (SSO), then move will basically be a copy.

]]> By: Sandeep https://www.fluentcpp.com/2017/04/25/move-iterators/#comment-226 Tue, 25 Apr 2017 13:05:00 +0000 https://www.fluentcpp.com/?p=1069#comment-226 In the display code above, I think it is not necessary the a moved from object (string in this case) will print ”. The object is in a valid, but unspecified state.

]]>